Sunday, August 12, 2012

The Case of Preston Hughes III: Down the Rabbit Hole


"In another moment down went Alice after it, never once considering how in the world she was to get out again."

In Singularity, I made my case that the police searched Preston's apartment twice: once prior to 2:58 AM and once after sunrise. In this post I will attempt to recreate the events that took place during the time surrounding those two searches.

Keep in mind that the following scenario is a hypothetical. It presumes two searches such as just described. It assumes police behavior that fits the evidence as I understand it. I do not present it as fact. I base some of the narrative on trial transcripts, which I have begun recently to receive. The names of the police officers have not been changed to protect the innocent.

Buckle up. Down the rabbit hole we go.

Officer F.L. Hale arrived at the crime scene as the CSU investigator. His job was to photograph the evidence, secure the evidence, and transport the evidence to the property locker for secure storage or to the lab for analysis.

Hale began by taking 21 color Polaroids. Copies of all 21 Polaroid images were provided to Barbara Lunsford in response to her open records request. None of the photographs referred to henceforth have anything to do with the Polaroids.

Hale would expose two rolls of 35 mm film. Assuming each role was good for at least 36 exposures, and assuming Hale exposed them all, then Barbara Lunsford should have received copies of at least 72 images from the crime scene, the apartment, and the morgue. She did not. She received 50 such images. (See my floundering effort to convince you that 22 images were withheld.)

Hale took at least 24 images of the crime scene. Those images included pictures of Marcell's body, the location where Shandra fell, the trail, the hole in the fence, and Fuddruckers. Those images did not include any pictures of Shandra, since she had been transported from the scene by the time Officer Hale arrived. If Officer Hale took one or more pictures of Shandra's eyeglasses at the crime scene, as some people have suggested, then he took more than 24 images of the crime scene.

From the crime scene, Officer Hale traveled one mile to West Houston Memorial Hospital. There he picked up some of Shandra's personal items, including her shoes, her shorts, her gold neck chain, a note with a phone number and the name "Dog", and just the right amount of money for a dime bag.

Though the hospital took everything belonging to Shandra except the shirt off her back (literally), they turned her away while she was bleeding out (or already dead) from a severed carotid artery and severed jugular vein. They sent her to Ben Taub, 15 miles away. If Shandra had by some miracle been alive, she had no chance to survive the ride to Ben Taub. There she was pronounced DOA, more than an hour after the arrival of the first police officer at the crime scene. Her treatment, or lack thereof, at West Houston was not only sad, it was unusual.
Singularity is almost invariably a clue.
While Officer Hale visited West Houston Memorial, Sergeants Gafford, Bloyd, and Hamilton made their way to Preston's apartment. They instructed Hale to meet them there.

At the apartment complex, Hale took at least one photograph of the apartment building at the northwest corner of the Lakewood Village complex, though Preston lived neither in the building nor anywhere in the complex.

HPD Photo

Google Satellite View
Google Satellite View
I have no idea why Hale took that picture.
Singularity is almost invariably a clue.
Officer Hale also took at least one photograph of Preston's apartment building,  a close up of the stairway landing and the front door.

HPD Photo
Officer Hale did not initially enter Preston's apartment with the three sergeants. The three knocked on Preston's door for 5 to 10 minutes before Preston answered. Preston was in his underwear. The police asked if they could speak with him. He agreed and invited him in.

The police asked Preston if he would talk with them downtown. Preston agreed. He went to his room to put on some clothes. Sgt. Hamilton went with him.

Sgt. Gafford would later testify that while waiting in the living room, he noticed the glasses between the cushions of the couch.

Sgt. Hamilton would later unwittingly testify that the lights were off in the apartment, that it was dark in there, that Sergeants Gafford and Bloyd waited in the living room in the dark. Sgt. Hamilton would offer this testimony under oath while being cross-examined about any effort to search the apartment by looking around. Sgt. Hamilton testified that the living room was always so dark that he could not have seen anything if he wanted to.

Sgt. Ferguson (who would conduct the second search and extract the second confession) unwittingly testified under oath that someone standing where Sgt. Gafford claimed he stood could not have seen the glasses even if they had been there, even if the living room was well lit. Sgt. Ferguson would offer this testimony under oath while being cross-examined about the positioning of the camera necessary to make the glasses visible in the photograph.

The three sergeants and Preston left the apartment. In the police reports and the trial testimony, several of the three make a point of noting that Preston left the apartment last and locked the door with his key.

Sgt. Gafford will testify later that he may have been given a master key to Preston's apartment by the complex manager. He simply can't remember. (It is my understanding that the complex manager testified that he did indeed give Sgt. Gafford a master key to Preston's apartment. I cannot yet confirm that.)

A patrol officer, or two, transported Preston to the police station in the back of a marked police car.

[Caution everyone. This is where it becomes more speculative. I'm writing of a possible scenario, not of established fact.]

Sergeants Gafford, Bloyd, Hamilton, and Officer F.L. Hale returned to Preston's apartment. They re-entered using the master key provided to Sgt. Gafford by the complex manager. They searched the apartment. Officer Hale took photographs. If he took just as many as he did during the later daylight search, he took at least 14 photographs. That would bring the photo count to at least 40 photos.

Sergeants Gafford and Bloyd returned to the police station.

CSU Officer Hale returned to the police station in a separate vehicle. He logged the items collected into the property locker. Property Officer F.L. Martin placed Hale's property invoice into his [Martin's] typewriter, typed the time "2:58am", typed his name, and initialed or signed by his name. The eyeglasses were not on the list of items that Hale turned into the property room, nor was the green leafy substance. The Busch beer can was.



Officer Hale traveled to the morgue where he claims to have photographed both Shandra and Marcell. Barbara Lunsford received three images of Shandra Charles at the morgue. Presuming Officer Hale took at least one photograph of Marcell that Barbara did not receive, that brings the photo count to at least 44.


After waiting for an extended time to be questioned by any of the sergeants who desperately wanted to speak with him at the station, Preston was interviewed by Sgt. Gafford. Things moved more quickly at that point. Without too much delay, Sgt. Gafford typed out a confession which Preston signed. Two witnesses entered the room and signed after the fact, after asking Preston if he had signed voluntarily. The witnesses signed at 7:15 AM.  (I will write more of this when I discuss Preston's confessions and more still when I discuss the trial.)

The nominal work shift for Gafford and Hale was 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM. They would work well into the day, however, finishing their reports on Hughes. The next shift of homicide detectives arrived just about the time Preston's first confession was being witnessed. Sgt. Gafford briefed incoming Sgt. Ferguson and Sgt. Yanchak on the Hughes case.

[Reminder: Some, perhaps all, of what follows may be a bit speculative.]

Ferguson and Yanchak realized that Gafford had screwed the pooch. Not only had he searched the apartment without a warrant, he had collected property from the apartment and turned it into the locker room. The only possible witnesses were dead and would not be testifying against Hughes. The clothes had no apparent blood on them, the knife had no apparent blood on it. There was not a spot of blood to be found in the apartment. The clothes and knife would be tossed in any case because they were collected without a warrant. The HPD had no physical evidence and no witness evidence tying Hughes to the crime. The only thing that they had was Hughes' confession, and that was crap. It made no mention of the little boy, and it did nothing to explain the girl being found with her pants pulled part way down her hips.

Ferguson and Yanchak set about to repair the damage.

[Remember, speculative.]

They orchestrated a tale about the girl naming Preston as her attacker. At least Hamilton had the good sense to sit with her alone so that no one would be able to overhear anything she did or did not say. (Hamilton did not offer her a whit of first aid, but he did sit with her, as she bled out, until the paramedics arrived. See Shandra's Final Hour.) Neither Ferguson nor Yanchak realized that Shandra's wound was fatal within three minutes. Neither realized that she could not have given a dying declaration to Hamilton or anyone other than the person who stabbed her. (See any one of many posts, perhaps Silence of the Lambs and its immediate successor Where's Willis?)

They decided to stage a second search of the house, one that would take place after the signing of a Voluntary Consent to Search form, one that would be photographed in the daytime.

A warrant would be particularly troublesome. It would require them to sign and swear to affidavits before a judge. Better they get a Voluntary Consent to Search form. For some reason still unclear, Preston would not sign it or they did not ask. Instead they manufactured a form by pasting the body of a consent form over Preston's signature from another form. The evidence of that composite form is quite obvious even to a casual observer.

Note the tape lines just above "VOLUNTARY CONSENT FOR SEARCH AND SEIZURE." Note the tape lines just above Preston's signature.

At trial, several of the officers already mentioned would testify that budget constraints caused them sometimes to Xerox forms. I assume any suspicion about the document could be resolved by simply introducing the original document as evidence at the trial. I cannot not yet confirm whether or not that was done.

Ferguson and/or Yanchak collected the evidence from the property room. They collected the eyeglasses from wherever the glasses had been. They traveled to Preston's apartment, and entered using Preston's now-surrendered key. They placed Preston's items according the sketch Sgt. Hale had made as part of the first search.

They instructed Officer Hale to meet them at the apartment. He arrived and shot additional pictures of the items in Preston's apartment. He shot a picture of the the glasses between the cushions of Preston' couch. That picture was shot in the daylight. The living room lights were off.


During his testimony, Sgt. Ferguson testified that, though it was daylight, Officer Hale turned on the living room lights and used a flash to take the pictures of the couch. Apparently, Sgt. Ferguson was recalling a photograph other than the one above.

Sgt. Ferguson or Yanchak transported the evidence from the second search and tagged it into the lab, presumably for testing. The chain of custody would not reflect that the evidence made an intermediate stop as it traveled from the property room to the lab for testing. If the chain of custody documents are properly time stamped, and if my hypothetical speculative scenario is somehow correct, then the time stamps will indicate that it took Ferguson and/or Yanchak hours to transport the evidence from the property room to the lab.

In retrospect, it is not at all clear why the police would pull the evidence from the property room and transport it to the lab, if not to use it for illicit purpose. As it turns out, the police had no interest in actually testing the evidence. Neither the clothing nor the knife was tested for blood for 213 days. The clothing would be subjected to a presumptive test for blood, a non definitive test, just 4 days before James Bolding would testify at trial. (Bolding was the supervisor of the serology section of the HPD crime lab.) The presumptive test would be positive for blood.

(Note that presumptive tests are usually conducted when no blood is visible to the naked eye. The presumptive test causes a host of materials, including blood, to react in noticeable fashion. The presumptive test helps the technician decide which areas should be subjected to definitive testing.)

That clothing would be subjected to a definitive test for blood just one day before Bolding testified. The clothing tested negative for blood. There was no blood on Preston's clothing.

(The testimony focused on whether or not the presumptive test could distinguish between human and animal blood, as if that were of significance. Almost nothing, literally almost nothing, was said of the definitive test or its results. Even a skeptical observer would have to read the transcripts several times over before noticing it.)

Though it seems impossible, the police were even less interested in testing the knife. The knife would not be tested for blood until Bolding was actually sitting in the witness box. He actually tested the knife while sitting in the witness box. He could perform only a presumptive test for blood on the knife, given the constraints of the exceptionally bizarre test environment. And, I suspect, that was the whole point. The presumptive test returned positive for blood.

(Persistent readers of this august blog know that the knife could not be the murder weapon. For those of you who have joined us more recently, I refer you to On Being Blunt and Marcell's Neck.)

While at the apartment for the daylight search, Officer Hale took at least 14 pictures. That brings the running total to at least 58.

Officer Hale traveled from the apartment back to the field to take some photos there in the daylight. There he took at least 7 photos in the daylight. That brings the running total to 65, seven short of the nominal 72 exposures for two rolls of 36 exposure film.

Seven photos are not a lot for a daylight photo session of a double murder crime scene. Perhaps Officer Hale ran out of film.

Assuming my accounting of the photos is correct, and assuming Officer Hale exposed two entire rolls of 36 exposure film without overshoots, then 22 photographs are missing from the collection sent to Barbara Lunsford in response to her open records request.

I presume at least one of them is a picture of Marcell Taylor at the morgue. I presume 14 of them are pictures from the first search of Preston's apartment. That leaves 7 unaccounted for.

Perhaps my accounting is incorrect. Perhaps Officer Hale did not expose two complete rolls.

Perhaps 7 photos found their way down a rabbit hole.

 <-- Previous                           Table of Contents                              Next --> 

The Case of Preston Hughes III: Singularity

In the Boscombe Valley Mystery, Sherlock Holmes observed:
But it is profoundly true. Singularity is almost invariably a clue. The more featureless and commonplace a crime is, the more difficult it is to bring it home.
Interesting. Something surprisingly unusual is almost always a clue. Consider then, once again, the property invoice.

If the police did indeed search Preston's apartment around 9:15 AM on September 27, why does the property invoice show a time of 2:58 AM on September 27?

Where is the "green leafy substance" Officer F.L Hale recovered from Preston's dining room table, the substance he kept in his "care control, and custody until tagged in the police property room"?


Where are Shandra's eyeglasses that Officer F.L. Hale recovered from between the cushions of Preston's couch? He claims he turned them over to the lab for printing. Why did he not at the same time turn the Busch beer can over to the lab for printing?


In the Hound of the Baskervilles, Holmes advised:
The more outre and grotesque an incident is the more carefully it deserves to be examined, and the very point which appears to complicate a case is, when duly considered and scientifically handled, the one which is most likely to elucidate it.
Interesting. An investigator should welcome confusing evidence, since that evidence, carefully considered, is most likely to bring clarity to the case.

Consider then this photo.


At first blush, it seems to be nothing more than a shot along the hallway looking into Preston's bedroom. Those are his jeans lying on the ground, and his blue work shirt lying just beyond.

But there is mystery here. Look again at the photo.

Do you see it?

Look again. Tilt your head so that the doorway is vertical and walk forward a bit.


How about now?  Do you see it?

Focus above the chest of drawers.


Now you can see what has been bothering me for quite some time. It shouldn't have taken me so long to figure it out, but I now believe I understand. Off and on, during that all that time, I kept thinking of Holmes.
Singularity is almost always a clue. (BOSC)
It shouldn't have taken me so long to figure it out, but it did. I kept wondering if I was only imagining what I see in the picture. I kept wondering if someone had falsified the 2:58 AM time stamp on the property invoice. It was always so simple, just as I had been told it would be.
It is a mistake to confound strangeness with mystery. (STUD)
You see it now as well, don't you. There is light coming from behind the sheer curtain. It is light outside. The photograph was taken in the daytime. The police could not have recovered the items photographed during this search and turned them into the locker room by 2:58 am. They cannot violate space and time any more than you can.

No need to look for a street light outside Preston's second floor window. I already did, using Google satellite view and Bing birds eye view. There is none there. I know the search engine images are not from 1988. I realize that maybe a streetlight had been removed between now and then.  But I don't think so.

The table lamp is turned off. It does not need to be on because it is light outside. Don't believe me? Just back up and take another look down the hall.


The hall light isn't on either, because it is light outside. As icing on a well-illuminated cake, the light switch is in the off position.

So, I figured, the 2:58 AM time on the property invoice must be wrong. Maybe someone falsified the document? But who and to what end? Maybe it was just a simple clerical error. Maybe the typist meant to enter 2:58 PM. The "A" and "P" keys, however, are just about as far apart as they can be on the keyboard. Surely the person typing the document knew whether it was the middle of the day or the middle of the night.

It seemingly made no sense, but it was so, so simple. And I was so, so slow to figure it out.
As a rule, the more bizarre a thing is the less mysterious it proves to be. (REDH)
The police searched the apartment twice.

TO BE CONTINUED

 <-- Previous                           Table of Contents                              Next --> 

Thursday, August 9, 2012

Surprising Composure

From the Huffington Post:

The Impending Execution of Michael Hooper

Michael Edward Hooper sits on death row awaiting execution by the people of Oklahoma on 14 August 2012. Given that he has declined to pursue clemency from the State's Pardon and Parole Board, I suspect he will not survive the day.

From Hooper v. State (1997):
Michael Edward Hooper was tried by a jury and convicted of three counts of Murder in the First Degree ... In accordance with the jury's recommendation, the Honorable Edward C. Cunningham sentenced Hooper to death on each count. ... 
Hooper was convicted of killing his ex-girlfriend Cynthia Jarman [Cindy] and her two children, five-year-old Tonya and three-year-old Timmy. Hooper and Cindy met in 1992 and dated through the summer of 1993. On more than one occasion the couple fought and Cindy called police. At one point each had a victim's protective order against the other. Several times Hooper threatened to kill Cindy. In October or November, 1993, Cindy and her children moved in with Bill Stremlow. He told Cindy that Hooper was not welcome in their home. On December 6, 1993, Cindy told a friend she wanted to be with Hooper one last time and then stop seeing him. 
Hooper bought a Smith & Wesson 9mm pistol on July 15, 1993. During a traffic stop the next day the Oklahoma City Police Department [OCPD] confiscated the gun. The OCPD returned the gun on October 23, 1993, but kept the ammunition. Hooper went target shooting with friends in fields northwest of Oklahoma City the day he bought the gun and after it was returned. He took the gun when he worked out-of-state in late October and November and refused a co-worker's offer to buy it. On December 6 or 7, 1993, Hooper showed a 9mm pistol to a neighbor. 
On December 7, 1993, Cindy and her children drove Stremlow to work and borrowed his truck. Tonya got out of school at 3:30 p.m. Cindy was about fifteen minutes late to pick up Tonya; Tonya's teacher saw her get in Stremlow's truck next to a white male who was not Stremlow. Cindy failed to pick up Stremlow after work and he never saw her again; Cindy had Stremlow's only house key and he had to borrow his landlord's key to get in his house that night. Stremlow's truck was found burning in a field in northwest Oklahoma City the night of December 7. He recovered it the next day. Accelerant, probably gasoline, had been used to set the truck on fire and the windows were broken out. Stremlow returned to his house December 10; although there were no signs of forced entry, a dresser drawer was disturbed, a Jim Beam whiskey bottle was on the dresser, and ten dollars in cash was missing. Hooper's fingerprints were on the Jim Beam bottle, and other evidence showed Hooper and Cindy drank that brand of whiskey. 
Cindy and her children were reported missing on December 9. Police attempted to interview Hooper; he failed to come to the station and denied seeing Cindy for the past six months. Hooper appeared nervous and had a fresh scratch on his arm. Also on December 9, an area rancher noticed damage to his gate leading to a northwest Oklahoma City field. Inside the field he found broken glass, tire tracks, a bloody sock and a pool of blood. After hearing the missing persons report, the rancher contacted police. The next day police searched the field and found broken glass, tire tracks, a footprint, shell casings, a child's bloody sock, a pool of blood near a tree with a freshly broken branch, a blue fiber near the tree, and a grave site covered by limbs, leaves and debris. The grave appeared to be soaked with gasoline. Tonya, Timmy and Cindy were buried atop one another. Each victim had been shot twice in the head. There was a hole in the hood of Tonya's blue and purple jacket, and the white fiber lining protruded. A 9mm bullet pinned a white fiber to a branch on the grave. The branch appeared to have been broken from the tree near the pool of blood. 
Police arrested Hooper and searched his parents' house. They found the 9mm pistol, two shovels with soil consistent with soil from the grave site, two gas cans, and broken glass consistent with glass found in Tonya's coat and near the gate. Police found a 9mm bullet in Hooper's pocket. His shoe print was similar to the footprint at the scene and DNA evidence showed blood on Hooper's shoes was consistent with Cindy's blood. Shell casings found where Hooper went target shooting matched bullets shot from his gun and casings found at the crime scene. In the past, Hooper and his ex-wife Stefanie Duncan had regularly visited the field where the bodies were found. ... 
On December 13, 1993, Canadian County issued a warrant for Hooper, and police arrested him at his parent's home. After the arrest, police seized Hooper's tennis shoes and a 9mm bullet found in his pocket, and photographed a scratch on Hooper's arm. The shoes were later compared to a footprint at the scene, and DNA testing determined blood on one shoe was probably Cindy's. ... 
Stremlow and Officer Harlow testified that Stremlow spent the night at home on December 7, left, and returned to his house on December 10. Although there was no forced entry, dresser drawers were disturbed, ten dollars was missing, and a Jim Beam bottle bearing Hooper's fingerprints was on the dresser. Stremlow had told Cindy not to let Hooper visit their house. Stremlow had his landlord's key. The only other house key had been on his key ring with the truck key and was missing. ... Hooper argues since Stremlow spent one night at home before discovering the burglary, the bottle could not have been there before Cindy's death. ... 
Brett Blanton worked with Hooper during the autumn of 1993, and they shared a room when working in Illinois. Blanton testified that Hooper had a 9mm semiautomatic pistol, often went target shooting, cleaned the gun often, and slept with it nearby. Once Hooper fell asleep holding the loaded gun and Blanton had to take it away. ... 
Officer Abrahamson testified that Cindy reported a February 19, 1992 fight during which Hooper pulled the phone out of the wall, pushed and choked her, and threatened to kill her. Officer Abrahamson said Cindy appeared angry and upset. ... While investigating the February 19 fight, Officer Wilson called Hooper at the telephone number listed for Hooper in the police report. A person identifying himself as Hooper returned Officer Wilson's call, and told Officer Wilson he and Cindy fought on February 19 and he pushed her and put his hands around her throat. ... 
Hooper argues that the evidence presented at trial is insufficient. He suggests the DNA evidence was ambiguous and the physical evidence cannot be connected in time with the murders. He claims he could not have committed the crimes in the time available, and states it is impossible to connect him with the State's theory of Tonya's death ... 
Circumstantial evidence connecting Hooper to the murders includes:
  • Hooper's relationship with Cindy was marked by physical violence and death threats in the two years preceding the murders; 
  • although Cindy left Hooper in the autumn of 1993, on December 6 she told a friend she wanted to be with Hooper one last time; 
  • at approximately 3:45 p.m. December 7 Cindy and Tonya were seen in Stremlow's pickup with a white male other than Stremlow; 
  • the driver and passenger windows in Stremlow's truck were broken in the field near the grave; 
  • broken window glass on Hooper's carpet was consistent with glass in Tonya's jacket pocket; 
  • broken window glass consistent with glass from Stremlow's truck was found near the crime scene; 
  • Hooper's shoeprints were similar to a footprint found near the broken gate at the crime scene field; 
  • DNA evidence showed blood on Hooper's left and right shoes was consistent with Cindy's; 
  • the victims were buried in a single grave which was saturated with gasoline; 
  • soil on shovels in Hooper's garage matched the composition of soil from the grave; 
  • the grave was in a wooded area, covered with branches and debris, in a field where Hooper had been before; 
  • on December 9 officers saw a fresh scratch on Hooper's arm; 
  • 9mm casings were found in the field, and a 9mm bullet was embedded in a branch on the grave; 
  • the three victims were each shot twice, and the wounds were consistent with a 9mm bullet; 
  • Hooper owned a 9mm pistol and evidence showed that either the Oklahoma City police or Hooper had exclusive possession of the pistol since its July 15, 1993, purchase; 
  • on December 6 or 7, Hooper showed neighbors a 9mm pistol; 
  • Hooper had a live 9mm bullet in his pocket when he was arrested; 
  • shell casings from the scene matched casings found where Hooper practiced target shooting and also matched a bullet test-fired from Hooper's gun; 
  • the 9mm bullet embedded in the branch on the grave was fired from Hooper's gun; 
  • white fibers consistent with Tonya's jacket were pinned to the branch on the grave by the 9mm bullet from Hooper's gun; 
  • the branch on the grave appeared to come from a limb near a pool of blood; 
  • DNA evidence showed the blood pool was consistent with Cindy or Tonya; 
  • blue fibers consistent with Tonya's jacket were near the blood pool; 
  • a small, hot object made a hole through the outer blue fabric and white fiber lining of Tonya's hood; 
  • after December 7, a person entered Stremlow's home without forced entry, and the only key to the home was on the truck key ring; 
  • after December 7 Hooper's fingerprints were found on a Jim Beam bottle left on Stremlow's and Cindy's dresser.
From Hooper v. Mullin (2002)
[Hooper] argues his defense expert's testimony failed to support his defense and, instead, bolstered the State's DNA evidence. ... The State's expert already established that blood consistent with Cynthia Jarman's blood was on one of [Hooper's] shoes. The defense expert's testimony that Cynthia Jarman's blood also might have been on the other shoe fails to add anything more to the State's case. ... 
[Hooper's] counsel did argue that [Hooper] did not have time to commit the murders. During trial, counsel elicited testimony from [Hooper's] stepfather that he saw [Hooper] at home at 3:20 p.m., and that [Hooper] returned home around 6:30 p.m. The victims were last seen around 3:45 p.m., and Stremlow's burning truck was discovered around 9:00 p.m. that evening. During guilt stage closing arguments, [Hooper's] counsel argued that [Hooper] did not have enough time to kill the victims, move the truck, and walk the seven and a half miles back to his house in three hours.
From a recent article the San Francisco Chronicle:
An Oklahoma man on death row for the slayings of his ex-girlfriend and her two young children has waived his right to ask the Pardon and Parole Board to commute his death sentence, his attorney said Monday. ... 
Prosecutors alleged the victims were with Hooper in a pickup truck in a mowed field when Hooper placed the muzzle of a 9mm pistol under Cynthia Jarman's chin and shot her. Blood in her lungs indicated she had time to draw a partial breath before he shot her execution-style in the right temple, authorities said. 
Prosecutors alleged that he then shot the children to prevent them from being witnesses to their mother's murder. Timmy Jarman was shot in the nose and the right temple. Tonya Jarman, who officials said escaped from the pickup truck and ran, was shot once under her left eye and once in the left temple. 
Prosecutors allege Hooper poured gasoline on the bodies to keep wild animals from finding the grave where he placed them and covered the grave with grass, leaves and branches.
I oppose the execution of any person who might be innocent of the crime for which he is about to die. In all other cases, I stand mute.

I find no one advocating Michael Hooper's actual innocence. I find none of his appellate arguments related to guilt/innocence to be compelling. Other than the possible timing issue associated with his fingerprints on the whiskey bottle, I find none of his appellate arguments to be thought-provoking.

In the case of Michael Edward Hooper, I stand mute with respect to the propriety of his execution.

ADDENDUM (14 Aug 2012)
Michael Edward Hooper was executed by the people of Oklahoma on 14 August 2012.

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Michael Ledford's Petition for Absolute Pardon: Chapter 1

DRAFT 
(Current as of 8 Aug 12)

1. THE APARTMENT

Michael, Elise, and one-year-old Zachary Ledford lived in Apartment 17A of the Highland Hills Apartments complex in Stuarts Draft, Virginia. An overhead view of the complex is presented below. Building 17 is circled in red. North is towards the top of the image, as per convention.


As shown in the photo below, the Ledford apartment was located on the first floor, to the left as you enter Building 17. The orientation of the building will prove to be of some significance. North is to the right in the image below; south is to the left. West is into the image, and east is behind the reader. The front of the building is the east side.


Though the fire did not spread beyond the apartment living room, there was no need to actually enter the apartment to realize it had burned. The smoke streaks around the door testify to a serious fire within.


Similar streaks around an electrical outlet in the living room testify to a fire within the outlet, behind the faceplate.


Similar streaks beneath the circuit breaker panel in the master bedroom testify to a fire within the panel. When the panel door is opened, the heavy smoke deposition within is obvious.


Furthermore, two side-by-side images of the circuit breaker box, shown below, provide irrefutable evidence that either or both of the insurance investigators substantially altered and/or removed a circuit breaker.

1.1 The Floor Plan
The locations of the wall outlet and the circuit breaker panel are shown in the floor plan below.


The area around the entry door (at the upper right corner of the floor plan) is critical to this story. That area was captured in a photograph taken shortly before the fire, while the Ledford family and friends were celebrating Zachary's first birthday. 

<< PHOTO NOT SHOWN>>

That is Zachary in the photograph. He is sitting on the lap of a family friend.

The upholstered chair and ottoman are obvious in the photograph. The quilt rack is visible behind the chair. The rack is covered with quilts and Afghans. The quilt rack and the chair would, soon after this picture was taken, provide the primary fuel load for the fire.

The end table, which is integral to the couch, is visible at the left. On top of the end table is a lamp. That lamp may have provided the ignition source for the fire.

The lamp is plugged into an electrical outlet located behind the couch, beyond the left edge of the photograph. The wall switch visible near the entry door controls the outlet. You have already seen the electrical outlet in a photograph presented earlier in this petition. You have seen that smoke was being ejected from behind its faceplate.

One of the guests at the birthday party, the daughter of the woman sitting in the chair, experienced trouble while attempting to turn on the lamp. She had to try repeatedly, using both the lamp and the wall switches, before she was successful. The woman in the chair witnessed the trouble.

When Michael Ledford left the apartment that night, shortly before the fire broke out, he flipped the wall switch to the ON position.