Monday, May 3, 2010

The Case of Delma Banks: Part II

In Part I of this two part story on Delma Banks, I laid out the State's slam-dunk case against Delma Banks. Banks came to my attention because the Supreme Court just recently cleared the way for Texas to kill him. Texas had been giving it their best shot for almost thirty years (the murder having occurred in 1980) and they had come within 10 minutes of doing so in 2003, but the path now looks more clear than ever.

If you wish to experience this post as I intended, you should first read of the State's no-brainer case as I took the trouble to present it in The Case of Delma Banks: Part I. I know you won't do that though, if you haven't done so already. I know you. And you won't do that.

So I'll do the next best thing. I'll give you a real quick summary of the State's case, real quick, and then I'll go through it again as I did in my first post. This time, however, I'll add the tidbits that bring uncertainty to this seemingly open-and-shut case.

Real Quick Summary:

Thursday, April 29, 2010

The Case of Delma Banks: Part I

In a recent post, Hank Skinner Watch, I gave a quick rundown of the Texas death row inmates the Supreme Court had ruled against as they further delayed a decision on Hank Skinner. In all but one case, I found either insufficient information to pass even a preliminary judgment, or I concluded that the evidence of innocence was insufficient to pass the person through my coarse review filter.

The one exception was Delma Banks. With respect to that inmate, I wrote:

"Uh oh! That one doesn't look good. Not good at all. It has all the makings of a wrongful conviction, at least at first glance. I'll have to get back to you on that one."

 There is a lot of information out there, most of it written in support of a new trial for Banks. I have spent a dozen hours or so trying to make sense of it all. It's got me so befuddled, I've struggled trying to figure how to present it here in a fair, clear-cut manner. In this post, I'll describe the case as argued by the state. It's a compelling story of Delma Bank's guilt.

On Friday evening, 11 April 1980, 16-year-old Richard Whitehead (the soon to be victim) and a 14-year-old female friend, Patricia Hicks, encountered 21-year-old Banks at a bowling alley, and agreed to give him a ride home. Departing in Whitehead’s distinctive green Mustang (with a primer hood), the trio ended up drinking Coors beer together in a secluded park near Nash, Texas. Nash is a small town four miles west of the border town of Texarkana, where Banks lived with his parents.

Around 11:00 PM, the trio left the park and drove Patricia Hicks' home. Whitehead and Banks left Hick's house in the victim's Mustang. They briefly visited another of the Whitehead’s friends, Patricia Bungardt, shortly before midnight. That friend too witnessed Whitehead and Hicks traveling  in Whitehead's distinctive green Mustang.

A few hours later, at about 4:00 AM on Saturday, 12 April, Mike Fisher heard two gunshots coming from the part of the park where Whitehead and Banks had been drinking beer. On Monday, 14 April, at 10 AM, Whitehead's body was found in that portion of the park. He had been shot three times; his Mustang was missing; empty cans of Coors beer were strewn about.

Returning to the early hours of Saturday morning, Banks traveled approximately 175 miles west to Dallas, Texas. He arrived by 8:30 AM, about four and one-half hours after the gunshots had been heard. When Banks arrived in Dallas, he was driving a distinctive, multi-colored Mustang. There he stopped and asked a couple for directions. That couple, Charles Cook and his soon to be wife, Rita, were waiting for a bus that would transport Rita to her place of work. 

Charles Cook talked Banks into giving Rita a ride to work, and the three departed in the Mustang. After dropping Rita off at work, Cook and Banks continued to ride around together for much of the day.  They visited Cook's sister who also noticed the distinctive green Mustang (with primer hood). Banks stayed the next two nights with Cook and his family at Cook’s grandparents’ house in Dallas.

That Saturday, while riding around Dallas in the Mustang, Cook noticed blood on one leg of Banks’ trousers. When asked about the blood, Banks said he had shot a “white boy”. That evening, Banks told Cook that he had “decided to kill the white boy for the hell of it and take his car and come to Dallas”.

Cook noticed that Banks had a pistol. On Sunday evening, Cook took the pistol away from Banks and hid it. It was later identified as a .25 caliber Galesi handgun.

On Sunday, Banks made a collect call from Cook's house to his mother in Texarkana. Banks’ mother urged him to turn himself in. Later that weekend, Banks shared this information with Cook’s neighbor, Bennie Lee Jones.
After spending Saturday and Sunday night with Cook, Banks was given bus fair by Rita. On Monday, 14 April, Banks' boarded a Greyhound bus bound for Texarkana.

Early on Tuesday morning, 15 April, Cook abandoned the multi-colored Mustang in West Dallas. It was never recovered. Shortly thereafter, Cook sold the .25 caliber Galesi pistol, along with some jumper cables and tools from the Mustang, to his previously mentioned neighbor, Bennie Lee Jones.

Later that month, Banks telephoned Cook twice in an attempt to recover his .25 caliber Galesi pistol. On 23 April, Banks returned to Dallas. He traveled with two acquaintances, Robert Farr and Marcus Jefferson. Farr was Banks’ girlfriend’s brother-in-law. Marcus Jefferson was Banks’ girlfriend’s brother. Unknown to Banks, he was followed by law-enforcement personnel.

Upon arriving in Dallas, Banks drove around, looking for Cook’s house. Upon locating it, Banks went to the door of the house while Robert Farr and Marcus Jefferson waited in the vehicle. Banks asked Cook for his gun. Banks returned to the vehicle, and they departed. In the vehicle, Banks told Farr and Jefferson that Cook didn’t have his gun because he had given it to someone else. Cook, instead, gave Banks a .22 caliber pistol.

Departing from Cook’s house, Banks, still traveling with Robert Farr and Marcus Jefferson, apparently got lost trying to find the way back to the highway. The still-trailing law-enforcement personnel, after observing several traffic violations, initiated a traffic stop of Banks’ vehicle. A .22 caliber pistol was recovered from the vehicle. Banks was arrested, Farr and Jefferson were released.

On 24 April, the day after Banks had attempted to retrieve his pistol from Cook, law-enforcement personnel visited Cook and asked for Banks’ pistol. They were taken to neighbor Jones’ house. There, Bennie Lee Jones returned the .25 caliber Galesi pistol to Cook, who provided it to the police. This pistol was later determined to be the weapon that fired the bullets that killed 16-year-old Richard Whitehead.

In summary, Banks was the last person seen with Whitehead. Whitehead was killed where he and Banks had been drinking earlier. Banks drove to Dallas in Whitehead's Mustang. The murder weapon, a .25 caliber Galesi pistol, ended up in Dallas at the same time and place as Banks. Banks attempted to recover the gun, and identified the gun as "his" to his two companions.

So there you go. Case closed. 

Maybe.

ADDENDUM:
Make sure to read the follow-up post: The Case of Delma Banks: Part II

Monday, April 26, 2010

In Search of 54: Odell Barnes

Other than the distinct possibility he was executed for a crime he did not commit, Odell Barnes was not a sympathetic figure. He was a crack addict and admitted to stealing to support his habit. He racked up nine felony convictions by the time he was 21 years old. In one case he broke into a home, hit the female resident over the head with an iron, threatened her with a gun, threatened to kill the daughter, sexually assaulted her, robbed her, and stole her car.

The murder for which he was executed ...

Hank Skinner Watch

We're waiting to see how the Supreme Court rules on Hank Skinner's request for a writ of certiorari. I wrote about that in Good Morning, Hank Skinner. That was on March 25, the day after his last minute reprieve. While others were saying the Supreme Court might decide within a few days, I predicted it would be a month or so. Turns out I was right. I have no great insight into the Supreme Court. I simply figure that no government body anywhere can act more quickly than Texas does when goes for a death warrant, and that requires at least a month.

Word was out that the Supremes would come down with their decision last Monday, on the 19th. On that day, they announced that Texas could go ahead an execute Charles Dean Hood and Duane Buck, and gave adverse rulings in the capital murder cases of Ruben Cardenas and Delma Banks. Regarding Hank Skinner, they said "Maybe next Monday, the 26th." 

Today (perhaps last Friday), the Supremes announced that Texas could go ahead and execute Peter Cantu. Regarding Hank Skinner, they said "Maybe next Monday, May 3."

And so we will wait.

I have peeked at the cases of the other four. With respect to Charles Dean Hood and Duane Buck, they would not get through the coarse filter I'm using in my search for the 54 innocent people who have been executed by Texas. With respect to Ruben Cardenas, I can find almost no information on him.

With respect to Delma Banks .....

Uh oh! That one doesn't look good. Not good at all. It has all the makings of a wrongful conviction, at least at first glance. I'll have to get back to you on that one.

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Regarding Flying Machines, Feedback Loops, and Criminal Justice

I've been away for a bit, both physically and mentally. I'm running behind on my posts. It seems I owe the second part of my essay on feedback loops.

If you missed the first part, you can read it here. It will reinforce the point I hope to make, but it's not critical.

In a previous career, I designed commercial transport aircraft for a major aircraft manufacturer. It would be far more accurate to say I helped design airplanes. No one person designs large aircraft. The jumbo jets are some of the most technologically advanced and complex pieces of machinery around today. Despite their complexity, the fact that they travel near the speed of sound, in a near vacuum, at -65 degrees Fahrenheit, and despite the fact they carry around a quarter million pounds of fuel, commerical aircraft are one of our safest forms of transportation. You are far safer flying from Los Angeles to New York than you are driving from Azusa to LAX. 

The safety doesn't result from mottos or mission statements, from pledges or codes of conduct. The safety results from a cadre of engineers who know nature will smite them should they fail to follow the rules. It comes from legions of regulators and auditors, customers and lawyers who will descend upon them should one of their elegant designs fall from the sky. The world of commercial aviation is a world of feedback loops. Planes are safe because those who err are fed back upon, with prejudice.

The world of criminal prosecution is largely absent feedback loops. Judges and prosecutors are, for the most part, legally immune any consequence resulting from their misdeeds, whether careless or willful. The populace returns them to office based on inflated conviction ratios rather than upon any measure of accuracy. The appellate system provides thinly veiled cover for all but the most egregious acts of misconduct. The bottom line is our judicial system deals grisly justice because it is unrestrained by any meaningful, negative feedback.

Consider the case of Charles Dean Hood. I started an Innocence Scorecard for the man, and though I haven't yet completed it, I figure he is good for the two murders for which he was convicted. The US Supreme Court recently declined to hear his case, so Texas can now proceed with his execution. Hood had argued that he had not been given a fair trial becaused the female judge and the male prosecutor had  been doing the judicial hokey pokey. She had ruled favorably on his motions. She sustained him repeatedly.

The point wasn't that Hood was incorrect in his accusations. Not at all. The judge and prosecutor both admitted to their affair. They claimed, however, that it was all over between them at the time of the trial. They didn't mention it to anyone, say the defense team, because the two star-crossed lovers would never let something like their runaway hormones get in the way of their jurisprudence.

The US Supreme Court sided with the judge and the prosecutor. Those two are, after all, servants of the State. The defendant, on the other hand, is a murderer. Off to the gallows with him.

Neither the judge, the prosecutor, nor the State of Texas were fed back upon. There simply is no effective feedback loop in our criminal justice system. Don't believe me? Give it a try. Withhold exculpatory evidence from the defense. The court will rule that you didn't, and that even if you did it would be a harmless error. Bribe a witness with time off, or threaten a witness with time in. Either will get a pass. Pay a discredited DA $86,000 to mount a pathetic defense in a murder case, and the appellate court will look the other way. 

Our judicial system will continue to strap innocent people to gurneys as long as the State exempts itself from any consequences for its bad behavior. Our judicial system is a plane wreck, and nobody plans to investigate. The people on board probably deserved what they got.

tsj
22 Apr 2010